Tug of War - Conflicting Views of Security: A Meta-analysis of Public Opinion Research

Email this Page           Printer Friendly

 

Resource Type:

Report-Paper


Posted On: Mar 12, 2009

 


Posted By: Joanna Hecht

 


Description:

This report, produced by the Topos Partnership for the National Security Network and US in the World, examines why the public believes that Republicans are better at dealing with national security issues. Through an examination of public opinion research, the report examines the question, "What distinuishes the parties on security, and what can alter the existing dynamic?" The analysis indicates that the public sees different advantages for the two main parties, indicating that "security" can not be a one-dimensional issue:

"Democrats are advantaged when Americans are considering the nation's role in the world, our approach to interacting with other nations, the work we do cooperatively with others to address global problems and so on, [while] Republicans are advantaged when Americans imagine a narrow interpretation of 'security' as physical safety, use of force, addressing threats to our nation and so on."

 

Resource Materials

NSN meta 061208.pdf

Issues


National Security-Defense

Advocacy


Media-Communication
Building Outreach-Grassroots
Policy Advocacy